Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] B&H Should Respond To This Message
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 10:45:27 -0400
References: <B5F76995.22F6%john@pinkheadedbug.com>

It sounds very suspicious.

dan c.

At 07:22 AM 27-09-00 -0700, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>John Brownlow wrote:
>> 
>> on 26/9/00 11:21 pm, DonjR43198@aol.com at DonjR43198@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>> > This showed up on the University website and since we Leica users buy
a bunch
>> > of stuff from B&H, we should get an explanation for what is going on.
>> 
>> Yeah, well it's not remotely my experience with B&H,  who are very careful
>> about their reputation as well they should be. I don't doubt that the guy
>> had a problem but a lot of it sounds exagerrated to me. In any case all he
>> needs to do is cancel the credit card payment and hang on to the camera
>> until they give him an RA number. I certainly don't think B&H should
have to
>> reply to stuff like this in public forums.
>> 
>> --
>> Johnny Deadman
>> 
>> http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
>
>Who is the guy?
>I've dealt with B&H for decades and this ain't them.
>Mark Rabiner
>
>

In reply to: Message from John Brownlow <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] B&H Should Respond To This Message)