Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] B&H Should Respond To This Message
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:22:09 -0700
References: <B5F76995.22F6%john@pinkheadedbug.com>

John Brownlow wrote:
> 
> on 26/9/00 11:21 pm, DonjR43198@aol.com at DonjR43198@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > This showed up on the University website and since we Leica users buy a bunch
> > of stuff from B&H, we should get an explanation for what is going on.
> 
> Yeah, well it's not remotely my experience with B&H,  who are very careful
> about their reputation as well they should be. I don't doubt that the guy
> had a problem but a lot of it sounds exagerrated to me. In any case all he
> needs to do is cancel the credit card payment and hang on to the camera
> until they give him an RA number. I certainly don't think B&H should have to
> reply to stuff like this in public forums.
> 
> --
> Johnny Deadman
> 
> http://www.pinkheadedbug.com

Who is the guy?
I've dealt with B&H for decades and this ain't them.
Mark Rabiner

Replies: Reply from Bill Grimwood <Bill@grimwood.net> (Re: [Leica] B&H Should Respond To This Message)
Reply from John Hoang <johnhng@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] B&H Should Respond To This Message)
In reply to: Message from John Brownlow <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] B&H Should Respond To This Message)