Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Doug, and everyone else who has replied. They are all K-14, so I might just take one or two rolls to the lab in London. It's worth a go. I know I sold the Hasselblad gear in 1994, so the 120 rolls date from then. Matt - ---------- >From: telyt560@cswebmail.com >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodachrome exposed age? >Date: Sun, Sep 24, 2000, 10:59 am > > On Sun, 24 September 2000, "Matt Morgan" wrote: > >> >> Having sold all the pro gear years ago and getting back into it now, I was >> rummaging through boxes and boxes of photographic accessories in the attic >> today. Lots of good things that I'll start to reuse, but at the bottom of >> one box, I found 8 rolls of Kodachrome 35mm, and two rolls of Kodachrome 120 >> which are exposed. >> >> I have no idea what is on them, but I'd say they were exposed at least six >> or seven years ago! Is it worth processing them? >> >> Anyone know a lab in London I can take them to? Or a full address for the >> Wimbledon lab which I only have a PO Box number for? >> >> Thanks, Matt. >> > > Matt, > > If they say something other than "Process K14" you're out of luck. Since > they've been in the attic for "at least six or seven years" is suspect > they're gonners even if K14. If they'd been in a freezer that's another story. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/telyt > -------------------------------------------------- > Visit the Northwestern Alumni Association portal > page at http://www.nualumni.com to get free > web-based e-mail and many other exciting features. >