Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Keppler
From: Peterson Arthur G NSSC <PetersonAG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:19:05 -0400

Walt, I thought Alaska was "the big state."

:-)

Art Peterson


- -----Original Message-----
From:	Walter S Delesandri [mailto:walt@jove.acs.unt.edu]
Sent:	Friday, September 22, 2000 9:36 AM
To:	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Cc:	LUG
Subject:	Re: [Leica] Keppler

shoot a hand held shot or two at 1/15 with the Leica M (or hexar or canon rf
or 
nikon rf or canonet or????????)
then shoot a few at 1/15 with  Nikon SLR or whatever, just so it has 
a flapping mirror.

You don't need Keppler. (a proponent of $149 plastic bodies and 28-1000 f9.8
Korean 
lenses)... you'll see why PHOTOGRAPHERS use RFs......(I don't know why the
other 
90% of Leica owners own them, tho....)

You'll see the difference.....and it AIN'T lens quality. (although Leica
lenses 
are nice)

Good weekend to ya'll from the big state, 
Walt In Denton, Tx.

On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:41:10 -0400 khmiska <khmiska@umich.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> LUGers,
> Maybe this is old but did you see Herbert Keppler's article "SLR - Are
> the sacrifices we make to use an SLR worth it?" (page 27) in the June
> '00 issue of "Popular Photography." He makes a solid case for the Leica,
> Hexar and Bessa. Then on page 45 there's an article about a young
> photographer named Wayne Heller. Heller uses an M6 with lots of neat
> lenses, an F100 and a D1. Sounds like a very eager and enthusiastic
> young man.
> Kurt
> Ann Arbor
> 
>