Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Forbes article on mechanical wristwatches OFF TOPIC
From: "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 17:07:49 -0700
References: <379496752.969006982441.JavaMail.root@web613-ec.mail.com>

Are movements for the Rolex made by others?

Roland
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Hoyen Tsang" <htsang@email.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 1:36 AM
Subject: [Leica] Forbes article on mechanical wristwatches OFF TOPIC


> If you consider Patek Philippe a "ritzy ditzy bozo watch maker" then I'm
afraid you don't know watches very well...  Patek and A. Lange & Sohne are
the current top echelon of watchmaking.  You simply can't find movements
better finished or more aesthetically pleasing.  I also consider Blancpain,
Jaeger-LeCoultre, and Audemars Piguet to be among the top.  My current dream
watch, in fact, is the Patek "10 Days".
>
> Keep in mind that "in-house movements" doesn't mean much these days.
There is a reason why Rolex doesn't allow tours of their factory, whereas
real watch manufacturers like Blancpain often do.  It's assembly line
manufacturing vs skilled craftsmanship.  I guess you can argue that Rolex
caters to a totally different market than Patek and Lange do.  Apples and
oranges.
>
> Hoyen
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 00:34:57 -0400
> From: Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Forbes article on mechanical wristwatches
> Message-ID: <39C1A6F1.1807001F@yahoo.com>
> References:
<Pine.SOL.4.10.10009141439320.17051-100000@stargate.gpcc.itd.umich.edu>
>
> Hi
> Watches are an on and off hobby for me
> There are very few swiss watch makers
> still building their own movements.
> These include Valjoux, Eta, Zenith
> Rolex and a few of less important ones
> Zenith* and Rolex use the movements in
> their own watches leaving ETA and valjoux to supply
> the industry. While different watches with diifferent brand names
> may match for movement and caliber they will not necessarily
> be of the same grade or build quality. Any of the movement builders will
> hand select
> parts for the movements if the watch maker is willing to pay the extra
> $$$
> Also, many watch makers like to massage and tweek the movements
> a bit further for use in their top of the range watches.
> So even though your swatch has the same movement as someone
> else's speed master The speedmaster is likely to have a better balanced
> balance wheel, and will likely have been adjusted in several positions
> in temperature and humidity controlled environment. These extras
> will pay off 25 years from now when the Speedmaster is still running,
> perhaps a few minutes fast and the Swatch has long been thrown out
> or perhaps used to supply parts for a speedmaster
>
>
> *Zenith does on occasion supply other makers with movements
> It provided Rolex with detuned rainbow movements for their early
> daytonas.
>
> See Ya
> Javier
>
> PS: Please don't tell me that I forgot to
> mention Patek Phillip. I'm talking about
> serious watch makers here, Not ritzy
> ditzy bozo watch makers.
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
> Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from "Tony Woo" <tonywoo@netvigator.com> (Re: [Leica] Forbes article on mechanical wristwatches OFF TOPIC)
In reply to: Message from Hoyen Tsang <htsang@email.com> ([Leica] Forbes article on mechanical wristwatches OFF TOPIC)