Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/08/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Why Minolta?
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:01:20 -0400
References: <3.0.6.32.20000822135221.0094b100@pop.microtec.net> <39A29592.FEEDB61B@baer.rwth-aachen.de> <006f01c00bec$5ac7ba00$c0dffea9@d2p8j6> <39A21F2A.D59C5642@baer.rwth-aachen.de> <009101c00c5d$41435f00$d8d35818@triad.rr.com>
The old 50/1.4. I will post an url when I have the images ready.
Dan C.
At 07:32 PM 22-08-00 -0700, Joe B. wrote:
>
>That will be interesting to look at. Can you say which Minolta 50 you are
>talking about- if the AF 50/1.4, is it the old or new version?
>
In reply to:
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] Why Minolta?)
Message from Axel Schwieker <axel@baer.rwth-aachen.de> (Re: [Leica] Why Minolta?)
Message from "Terry Sham" <tsham@netvigator.com> ([Leica] Why Minolta?)
Message from Axel Schwieker <axel@baer.rwth-aachen.de> (Re: [Leica] Why Minolta?)
Message from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] Why Minolta?)