Re: [Leica] Leica survives WWIII

["Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net>]

Gary,

You've got it wrong. The policy doesn't pay if the damage is a direct result
of war, nuclear or otherwise. It also won't pay if the damage is the result
of a nuclear hazard. But, if the nuclear hazard causes a fire, and the fire
is the direct cuase of the damage or loss, the policy pays.

Comforting, isn't it <g>.

BTW, the Passport warranty doesn't cover fire.


Bryan



- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Elshaw" <gary.elshaw@vuw.ac.nz>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 5:02 PM
Subject: [Leica] Leica survives WWIII


> Bryan wrote:
> >Nuclear hazard (direct damage cause by fire which is, in turn, the result
of
> >a nuclear hazard is still covered)
>
> That's one of the funniest things i've heard in days (I don't get out much
> at the moment). So if there is an all out nuclear war, the insurance
> company will pay-out and replace your Leica kit. Gee, that's so comforting
> in a world with so few assurances today. Makes you wonder what they were
> thinking: 'Duck and Cover,' possibly?
>
>  :-)
>
> Take care,
> Gary
>
> _____________________________________________________________
>
> "The difficulty now is that unexceptional adults believe the loss of
> youthful dreaming is itself "growing up," as though adulthood were
> the passive conclusion to a doomed activity and hope during
> adolescence."
>
>
> OO             The Uses of Disorder
> [_]<|          Personal Identity and City Life -- Richard Sennett
>   /|\
> Gary Elshaw
> Post-Grad Film Student
> Victoria University
> New Zealand
> http://elshaw.tripod.com/
> http://elshaw.tripod.com/photointro.html
> _____________________________________________________________
>
>