Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: it DOESN'T work well for leica!
From: "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:26:09 -0700
References: <000601bfd53d$0b4a4000$397bd63f@ccapr.com> <004501bfd54c$25cbb080$c582e0d8@i928653>

> It is not the amount of light that counts. It is the quality of light
that
> will make or break the photograph.

I couldn't agree with the above; however,

> This is not to negate the work of any photographer who uses Noctilux
lenses:
> I would rather see a portrait of a person taken with fill flash at
f/4.0
> than one with dark eye sockets taken at f/1.4 in existing light.

I could not make such a generalisation.

Noctilux and other superfast Leica lenses allow us to record the light
that we do not see on most photographs.  When working in a controlled,
posed, studio setting, I may prefer to use artificial light.  Yet, there
are many more "portraits" that deserve to be taken outside the studio.
For these situations, Noctilux can be a useful tool.

I believe Ansel Adams once said, "There is nothing worse than a sharp
photograph of a fuzzy concept."

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: it DOESN'T work well for leica!)