Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: A law of photography
From: Jim Brick <>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 22:01:35 -0700
References: <> <v0401170fb55d0585f28d@[]>

At 11:36 PM 6/2/00 +00-02, Greg Locke wrote:
>At 01:14 AM 03/06/00 +0100, you wrote:
>>on 2/6/00 7:39 am, Henning J. Wulff at wrote:
>> > When I shoot 35mm, I'm really happy if I get 5 enlargeables from a roll.
>> > One is more like it. When I shoot 4x5, at least every second one is
worth a
>> > print. One 4x5 takes about as much effort as 36 35mm shots. Comes out
>> > for the input effort.
> to see you slinging that 4X5 around on an oil rig, a fishing 
>trawler or my typical assignments, Henning. :^)  Some situations were meant 
>for 35mm.
>Besides there is only one "BEST" shot from any shoot worth enlarging to any 
>Either you get it or you don't.

>Greg Locke                         St. John's, Newfoundland

How about a 4x5 Hobo?


In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <> (Re: [Leica] A law of photography)
Message from "Henning J. Wulff" <> (Re: [Leica] Film flatness and sharpness...)