Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Film flatness and sharpness...
From: "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 18:55:55 -0700
References: <v04011709b55cebd8e922@[209.53.32.31]><393747FF.716C@wenet.net><3937633D.FAE4724E@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <4.1.20000602145232.01ee15f0@gateway.photoaccess.com>

Hi Jim,

Next time you are in Carmel, stop into the Photography West  gallery and see
Beckett's contrast masked 40x50 ilfochromes from  8x10 transparencies.
Amazing.  Wouldn't know they were ilfochromes.

Tom

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brick" <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 2:54 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Film flatness and sharpness...


> At 10:37 AM 6/2/00 -0700, Tom Schofield wrote:
> >Perceived sharpness associated with very large (billboard or movie screen
> >sized) enlargements has more to do with viewing distance.  That's how
Kodak
> >amazes people in Grand Central Station with their print from Ektar and a
> >Kodak Point & Shoot.  Viewers are 50' away.
> >
> >Tom Schofield
>
> Viewing distance is the great equalizer.
>
> Unfortunately, people walk right up to my 48x60's and inspect it.
Sometimes
> with a Swiss Army Knife magnifier! Therefore they have to be "dead sharp".
>
> Jim
>

In reply to: Message from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (RE: [Leica] Film flatness and sharpness...)
Message from Rich Lahrson <tripspud@wenet.net> (Re: [Leica] Film flatness and sharpness...)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Film flatness and sharpness...)
Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: Film flatness and sharpness...)