Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Henning J. Wulff wrote: > >Also, have you ever REALLY compared a MF enlargement to a 35mm enlargement, > >of the same film for 'sharpness'? Hi Henning and everyone, The larger negative of 120 film has a hidden advantage beyond sharpness. Sometimes I find that the picture requires severe cropping. Indeed, there maybe more than one picture in a 120 negative!! Because of the larger size, cropping is a real world situation. With 35mm, cropping in one direction is possible, seldom in two, as than the image is really small and the limits of enlargement are reached sooner. However, I feel that my best shots are the ones that need no, or minimal cropping, the ones that seem to 'pop' out of the viewfinder at the instant of exposure. It's a definite feeling, like 'that's a keeper', maybe only one out of 36. When I develop the film, there it is. I don't make contact sheets, I know the shots that I want to print. Every photographer seems to develop (!) their own way of working, and my approach is not unique. Cheers, Rich Lahrson tripspud@wenet.net