Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 12:56:53 +0200
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell> <4.2.2.20000525172932.00ab7c20@infoave.net> <392DB421.2099D20F@home.com> <000901bfc6ed$4152fdd0$4e0a0a0a@simonl>
Simon,
I am not Ted, but like he I own the Noctilux and enjoy using it very much--when
the situation requires it. However, as my standard "carry around everywhere"
50mm lens I have the Summicron. The Noctilux is just too big and heavy in my
view to be a universal lens.
Nathan
Simon Lamb wrote:
> Ted
>
> Is the Noctilux a viable alternative to the 50mm f/2 or would it be wise to
> keep the f/2 when purchasing a Nocti?
>
> Simon
- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium and Zurich, Switzerland
e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
General photo page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator
Belgium photo page: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman
Replies:
Reply from "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
In reply to:
Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)