Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Laurent - Please pardon a US lawyer's follow up question, I'm not trying to be argumentative but just to clarify your meaning. As I read your statement with my own legal background, it means that if I go to France as a tourist I should just leave my camera at home, because almost any place I am likely to go would be a "public place" (as that term is used in the law over here.) Does the term "public place" apply that broadly in the law you describe, or is there a narrower definition (like airports and train stations) that would still allow me to take a picture of my family standing in front of the Eiffel Tower? Does the prohibition on photography apply to the taking of the photographs, or just to the publication of them (as distinguished from making prints for a personal scrapbook, etc?) Is the ban nationwide (you say "in France") and if so, would an authorization from the Paris mayor also be good nationwide? A nationwide ban on photography in most of the places people go strikes me as somewhat peculiar, in addition to being impossible to enforce with any consistency, but I know that all countries have their own perspective on values and enforce it as they see fit. Thanks for any clarification. Cheers, Kip Laurent SAMINADAYAR wrote, in part: > Hello, > > in France, for a reason I could not conceive, photography is > forbidden in public palces (railways satation for example). But you > can ask for an authorization at the proper service of Paris mayor.