Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Weight of Chrome v. Black Lenses
From: Guy Bennett <guybnt@idt.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 21:29:34 -0700

>I am a new list member and have a pretty stupid question -- Can someone help?
>
>I'm looking at the Leica web site regarding Summicron-M 35/2 asph  lenses.
>The
>chrome model weighs a hundred grams more than the black one.  I thought
>this might
>be a fluke, but on the other focal lengths the same trend occurs.
>
>I have a used M6 on order and need a lens... the camera body is a chrome
>one with
>black rewind, shutter speed, and wind lever -- so it's "two-tone" already.
>I can
>use either color and not be tacky.  So, I would prefer the lighter weight.
>But....
>why would a chrome lens add so much weight anyway?  Intellectual curiosity I
>suppose.
>
>Any comments regarding my choice of the 35/2.0 for a first all around "walking
>around" lens?



i believe the extra weight comes from the fact that the chrome lenses are
brass underneath - apparently, the chrome sticks to brass better than
whatever the black lenses are made from.

as for the 35 summicron for a first lens: YES!

guy