Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 4/6/00 3:04:46 AM, Walter writes: << Is film photography here for the long haul? At some point, digital imaging materials and processes will likely become as good as the best analog methods, and at an economical price. >> All technologies have an inevitable growth curve, starting from small beginnings, peaking for an a period, then starting a decline as newer technologies emerge. They never disappear entirely but are practiced at a low level for nostalgic purposes. Think of the technologies that have been superceded in photography over its two century life span. Daguerrotypes, calotypes, wet collodon, reseau color plates, glass plates, carbro color printing, dye transfer, and, to a great extent B&W (this will raise a few hackles) photography. I was an avid 8mm movie maker 20 years ago. My first computer was a Commodore Pet with tape cassette storage. My great grandfather hunted with a muzzle loading rifle. My wife's grandfather was a seaman on a sailing ship. My father was born about the time the horseless carriage started replacing horses. My mother was born the exact day the Wright brothers made their first flight. I lived most of my early years without television - and so on. Film is indeed on its inevitable decline. Trade sources estimate that digital cameras will outsell film camers by 2002. The Kodak annual report states that the company will receive most of its revenues from non-silver products within a few years. Six megapixel cameras which will probably provide almost the imaging capabilities of 35mm film will be available in the comsumer market before years' end. Nine megapixel cameras, which will equal 35mm capabilites, should soon follow. Inevitably someone will make a digital camera body which will enable you to use your Leica lenses. Can digital bokeh be far behind? LarryZ