Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Kindermann Canada camera servicing
From: Austin Franklin <austin@darkroom.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 17:09:38 -0500

Well, it depends on how these persons names were obtained, and how the 
contacts are made.  A companys employee list certainly can be considered 
confidential and proprietary, and it is certainly an asset of the company.

If I leave my company, and go to a competitor, and I, or my company through 
information obtained from me, solicit my old colleagues, that certainly 
would create a problem.  If, in a passing conversation, I am asked by an 
old colleague if there are any opportunities with my new company, then the 
coast is clear.

No horse, or hockey here, but it's an interesting concept...


> Horse Hockey.  Soliciting someone to obtain confidential or proprietary
> information about a competitor is certainly fraught with ethical and 
legal
> issues, but simple employment?   Horse Hockey!

> > >  Apparently the new Leica Distributor in Canada tried to have him 
switch
> > > job from Kindermann.  He refused.  Other technicians were also
> > > unsuccesfully approached.
> >
> > I believe in the US there are laws about soliciting people 'in this
> > manner'.  Usually, there are agreements in place that prohibit this. 
 If
> > the technician wanted to contact the new distributor, that is certainly 
OK
> > in my book, but for the new distributor to solicit them, I believe, is
> > unethical.