Re: [Leica] for sale as a result of our studio going digital

["Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com>]

Actually, I'd say a filter = cable.

Tom

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 4:50 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] for sale as a result of our studio going digital


> I don't know...I'd say the lens is more like the tuner, or maybe the
> speakers...Not the frigging cable! ...A lens shade? Now THAT's a
cable...and
> just as outrageously priced...;-)
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Dan Cardish
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 5:40 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] for sale as a result of our studio going digital
>
>
> That saleman would probably react in the same way if he heard what some of
> us pay for camera lenses!
>
> Dan C.
>
> At 12:15 PM 11-03-00 -0000, you wrote:
> >Simillarly off-topic, but on the same topic:
> >
> >I went into a high-end audio store because I couldn't find the widget I
was
> >looking for in my usual low-end audio place...As I stood at the counter I
> >noticed various speaker cables on the wall behind the counter.
> >
> >"How is that $9.95 cable?" I innocently asked.
> >
> >"$9.95? That's $995, Sir."
> >
> >"For a freaking piece of wire?"
> >
> >I left.
> >
> >
>
>
>