Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL
From: "Robert Bedwell" <rlb@triad.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 19:43:22 -0500

Sorry Peter....this is just not you.....much too patronizing.  You must have
had a tough day!!!!!!

Bob
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 6:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL


> Typical leica zealot.  You don't like my comments so you try to discredit
> the author.
> Hey, I am just saying my piece.  I like the M but that does not mean I
have
> to like everything put forth on the LUG.  Why would someone say 1/125 is
too
> slow when they are using 1/50 seconds?
> That's all I was asking.  Sorry you can't keep an open mind.
> Let me make you feel better, Leica is good, Leica lenses are sharp, Leica
is
> wonderful, feel better now?!
>
> Peter K
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shih, Chiente [mailto:chiente.shih@unisys.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 1:50 PM
> To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
> Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL
>
>
> I can't help but read the reply to Peter even though I did the filter to
get
> rid of some nonsense posts by Peter. I am satisfied with my M6 Sync flash
> speed. However I keep asking myself, why would someone spend lots of time
to
> post the anti-Leica messages in LUG ? Is it for fun ? or just the guy
> doesn't know what to do in the mean time. Go out shooting and get a life !
> Don't troll!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com
> [mailto:Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 2:40 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL
>
>
> Peter,
>
> Like I read in a recent magazine review about the Leica M6 TTL, "Flash?
That
> why they have Nikons (and in your case Peter, Canons)"
>
> You're pretty obviously a Canon enthusiast from your previous messages.
Why
> don't you stay in a mailing lists that talks about a system you can say
> something positive about??
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) [mailto:peterk@lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 1:45 PM
> To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
> Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL
>
>
> Sal DiMarco,Jr. wrote:
>
> edited....
> >For the first time, I had a chance to wrap my hands around a Konica
> >Hexar RF and the Viogtlander Bessa-R and to see the new lenses. I was
> >singularly un-impressed. Both cameras seemed filmsy. For me, the main
> >advantage of the Hexar was the X-sync. The 1/125 sync doesn't cut it. I
> told
> >the salesperson, if is had a 1/250 sync, I would be leaving the show with
> >one. His response was a 1/250 sync shutter would increase the cost of the
> >camera. I do not agree with his statement.  The lens mount was not
smooth.
> >The viewfinder OK. Word on the floor is the lenses aren't great.
>
> Then why are you satisfied with the 1/50 seconds on the M6?  Personally I
> would welcome the improvement, but unlike many I use flash.
>
>
> >Just remember in terms of lens quality, there is good, better and Leica.!
>
> Yes.  I will now get down on my knees and bow east to the great Leica
> camera...barf!