Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: RE: RE: [Leica] Re: Bessa R _ Skip Williams reference
From: Gaifana@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 19:07:43 EST

Jem - that system didn't survive at Canon, and by the P, the 7 and 7s, it was 
forgotten. From the ones I've seen at shows with the variable finders, the 
view wasn't that hot. Too much going on in there.

In a message dated 1/16/00 5:26:18 PM, jem.kime@cwcom.net writes:

<< 
Maybe I was hoping for too much! Looking at the pictures I've seen, this 
was what it appeared like to me. The appearance of the optics seen inside 
the viewfinder window from the front shows more optical 'gubbins' than I'd 
have associeted with a 'normal' system, I put that together with the frame 
selector and made an inspired guess. I haven't seen any spec. yet on the 
Bessa-R (do you have a source?)
The ability of Cosina/Voigtlander is quite capable of reproducing that 
design I'm sure.

Jem

- -----Original Message-----
From:   Gaifana@aol.com [SMTP:Gaifana@aol.com]
Sent:   16 January 2000 20:14
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject:    Re: RE: [Leica] Re: Bessa R _ Skip Williams reference

Jem, are you sure that's a variable mag viewfinder on the Bessar-R? It 
looks
more from the lever's position on the top plate that it is only a
frame-selector (on the Canon, the lever is closer to being right on top of
the finder). Besides, if the magnification were changing, wouldn't it stand 
to reason that the 90mm would necessitate higher magnification than the 35? 
On the Canons, the 35mm was 0,75x, the 50mm 1.0x and the longer lenses 
1.5x.
The only spec for the Bessa shows 1.0x at all lengths. I think reproducing 
a
41-year-old design as complex as the VI-L's finder may be hoping for too
much. : )



</XMP>

- ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <daemon@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Received: from  rly-yg04.mx.aol.com (rly-yg04.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.4]) by 
air-yg03.mail.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 17:26:17 -0500
Received: from  mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1]) 
by rly-yg04.mx.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 17:26:11 1900
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
    by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA08024; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 
14:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwcom.net (email.mcmail.com [195.44.0.150])
    by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA08014; Sun, 16 
Jan 2000 14:24:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ncime ([195.44.202.50]) by cwcom.net  with Microsoft 
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.117.11);
     Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:24:33 +0000
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:29:57 -0000
Message-ID: <01BF6071.3823BB60.jem.kime@cwcom.net>
From: Jem Kime <jem.kime@cwcom.net>
To: "'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'"
     <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Subject: RE: RE: [Leica] Re: Bessa R _ Skip Williams reference
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:29:46 -0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us

 >>