Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have been curious about about theater shots and have not been sure where to start with with 3200 film. What film speed and exposure did you use? Roland Smith - ----- Original Message ----- From: Simon Pulman-Jones <spulmanjones@lbs.ac.uk> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:21 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] Summarex question > Marc, > > Having looked at a ZOOEP yesterday I think the lens head of the Summarex is > going to be too large to fit any of the existing focus mounts - but I'm > going to contact Malcolm Taylor, an English Leica repairer and restorer who > is happy to have a go at making anything he thinks might be possible, to > see if he can make me up a focus mount. > > I'm very happy with what I shot with the Summarex in a theatre a couple of > days ago - the main limitation is that over-exposed highlights, especially > under theatre spot lights, get an abundance of the ethereal Leica glow - > which means that you have to expose for the highlights and lose shadow > detail if you don't want halos everywhere that make the picture look like > religious kitsch. Even so, it's a much more useful lens than I expected - > and it is the most solidly and beautifully constructed Leica lens that I > have yet seen. > > Simon. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc James Small [SMTP:msmall@roanoke.infi.net] > Sent: 06 January 2000 00:42 > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Summarex question > > At 11:40 AM 1/5/2000 -0000, Simon Pulman-Jones wrote: > > > >My question is this - the lens head of the Summarex unscrews behind the > >aperture ring making me wonder whether it can be fitted to one of the > >focusing mounts for the viso - such as the ZOOEP for the 90 Summicron. > > I cannot find a reference to this but, of course, am hungry to learn more! > > Marc > > msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 > Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! >