Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mike, I agree with your issues, in general, but there are those of us that don't have the facilities for doing anything with 4x5 negatives. (like me) I sold my 4x5 camera with its 90 and 210 lenses years ago because it was a pain to use and I couldn't get the negatives enlarged easily. Now I don't have room for an enlarger, much less a 4x5 enlarger, so I've gone chemical for my B&W film developing, and digital for printing (via a film scanner). I loved the negatives and transparencies that I got, but they sit in the drawer mostly. So the easiest and most versatile way for me to fine-grained photography is to use Agfapan 25. I used to use Tech Pan 2415, but it wasn't very easy to work with, although I got great results with (I think I remember this right) Technidol (??) or using custom-mixed chemicals (which I won't do again). I keep considering getting a used MF camera, but not yet. It will be just another toy. I need to continue to refine my vision. As you mention, the flexibility and spontaneity that I get with 35mm is unparalleled, and unless I have more time, I'll stay with that route. (I don't expect to get much more time though, I have two girls 7 and 4, and they don't leave me much free time.) Skip At 1/3/00 12:54 PM +0000, you wrote: >Anyone who uses a 35mm film slower than ISO 100 is using the wrong >format, except perhaps if all their shooting is done under studio >conditions. A 4x5 rig is simply not that expensive, especially if your >preferred 35mm brand is Leica. You can buy a whole 4x5 setup--new--for >the price of one of the more expensive Leica lenses, and have cash left >over for film. Invest in one! To those who prefer Leicas yet are >concerned that slow films might be "best," get with the program--you >need to look at more great Leica photography. Most of the great Leica >photographers did not, and do not, use namby-pamby, candyass slow films >because they were afraid of a little grain. They used faster films >because they were concerned with being able to photograph the world >around them with some degree of freedom. - ----------------------------------------------- Skip Williams Westfield, NJ skipwilliams@pobox.com - -----------------------------------------------