Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Look, friends, the black-and-white film you use DOESN'T MATTER. (Neither does the camera or lens you choose, but let's not go there). What matters is what you do with it--and whether you like it. A good photographic craftsman, of which I certainly am one, can make most any film behave tolerably--and no matter what film you want to name, it is possible to screw it up royally and make horrible-looking results. Whoever this benighted character "Bernard" might be, power to him. He can go right ahead and congratulate himself for using the films he himself approves of. If he breaks his arm patting himself on the back, it's all the same to me. Whatever film he approves of or doesn't approve of is absolutely immaterial to anybody but himself. The Deltas are fine films, capable of excellent results. Insults are immaterial, too. Over the years I've been insulted, occasionally even villified, for using the "wrong" papers; for liking warm-tone papers; for using the "wrong" developer; for not liking amidol; for not using pyro; for not advocating techniques I think are stupid and for advocating things I like; for stating the results of tests honestly, and for not going along with various cults that seek to canonize everything from particular formats to particular processes to particular photo-Gods to particular chemicals. Believe me, in my job, I've been there and done that--or had that done to me--so many times I've lost track. You do know, don't you all, that there are whole groups of fanatical photographers who think it's not even possible to make remotely valid work in 35mm?!? They'd dismiss ALL OF US on this list. The more esoteric photographic craft gets, the more extreme the passions seem to run. It doesn't matter. The camera you use, the lens you choose, the film you like, the films you hate; craft, or anti-craft; your particular prejudices and preferences with regard to the darkroom, digital output, format, or this or that style and subject matter; it just simply doesn't matter. People can't even agree on who the best photographers are. Name the one photographer you think is absolutely, undisputably great, and chances are somebody will STILL be willing to badmouth that person's work. One of my favorite photographers is a travel writer named Eric Newby. I wish I had more of his books; I only know of one, called _What the Traveller Saw_. He photographed simply, honestly, and basically, with a rudimentary Pentax and a standard lens, and either Tri-X or some close equivalent. But he saw lots, and he saw well. I love his work. I wish I had the confidence to work as simply and directly. Two-thirds of the photographers I personally admire used Tri-X. I love Tri-X. Don't like the same photographers I do? Fine. Understood. Like a different film? Fine, fine. I don't get any extra credit with anybody for using Tri-X. Your work doesn't earn any extra credit from anybody but yourself because you use YOUR favorite film. _It_doesn't_matter_. What matters is the print on the wall...or wherever your photographs end up in whatever form you choose to realize them. Your prejudices won't help you. Your preferences won't save you. What matters is your taste, craft, vision, honesty, understanding, intelligence, skill, and judgement; what you care about, and how _much_ you care about it; and how hard you are willing to work. - --Mike