Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My understanding of the review is just that...I believe the 24mm is a Minolta design, and is not up to the standards of the newer wide angle R lenses. The 19 in particular is reputed to be excellent, though I have not used it. Best Wishes Dan > >At the end of M24 mm f/2.8 asph test, Erwin also mentions about R24 that I >can't understand. He said "Some years ago I tested the R version against >the >Nikon 2.8/24 and I found the outcome a draw." > >What does it mean? Is R24 quality the same as nikkor? > >Happy Shooting! and Merry X'Mas > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com