Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]ONCE AGAIN, Gary, you had the "option" of viewing it or not. Pascal gave us all a choice by pointing out that it was a "glamour and nude" image. It was your decision to view it, period. Francesco Sanfilippo, systemadmin@onebox.com Internet Developer & Systems Administrator http://www.glossymedia.com/ http://www.photorealm.com/ - ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary D. Whalen <whalen@circle.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 1:34 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon LS-2000 sample > My point was not that the image was pornography. I do not think it is. > My point is that that image is not NECESSARY to show the abilities or > lack of with his 2000. Uncalled for and unnecessary. Maybe sleazy > would be a better word. > > Gary > > Jeff Moore wrote: > > > 1999-12-10-15:40:22 Gary D. Whalen: > > > Shame on you. Your picture is a cancer to this newsgroup. > > > > Well. Gary has a few issues. > > > > Were I to feel compelled to render judgement, I wouldn't have gone > > much beyond "mildly tacky". But I don't, so I didn't say that. :-) > > > >