Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]From: Andrew Nemeth <azn@nemeng.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 23:49 Subject: [Leica] Need a Moderated List (long response) > Keep the LUG for the wide-ranging, off-the-rail stuff. > But have a separate, focused list for those of us who > want to learn and share knowledge about Leica-related > photography. My experience of cyberspace discussion fora--and it is substantial--has taught me that, given a choice between an unmoderated forum and a moderated forum, the former will typically contain essentially all traffic, and the latter will dry up and wither away. > By your own example Bryan, not everyone who runs a list is a > egomanical fascist. Fascists are not the only people who censor communication. > I belong to many lists which are moderated, only > occasionally does the moderator have to weigh in to > exercise a little control. All moderation is a form of censorship. The name changes, but the act remains the same. > If there was a new, separate list which could remain > sort-of focused on Leica issues, then don't you think > that our friends at Solmns might actually start paying > attention? If they are cyberspace-aware (rare amongst Europeans, but conceivable), they are already paying attention. If they are not cyberspace-aware, creating a new, separate list will not make them so, and thus would not attract their attention. > And my point is that there should be a *separate* list > where the 'certain amount of off-topic chatter' is kept > to a tiny percentage. This concept does not work in practice. > I have yet to find a way of filtering the nonsense > out of the Digests prior to downloading each 76 KB > instalment. Subscribe to the individual-message format, instead of the digest format. > Can't filter digests prior to downloading them. Correct. See above. > Because I need my email as part of my business and therefore > can't afford to be wading through 100's of separate messages > a day. You should configure your e-mail software to do this for you. -- Anthony