Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Anthony, you're not trying hard enough to get outside your own head > > and inside those of the people around you. In their minds, the > > scenario goes like this: > > > > - Photographer takes a picture of little Sarah in the playground. > > > > - Photographer keeps an eye on who little Sarah goes home with, > hears > > Mummy call her by name, and maybe even finds out where she lives. > > > > - Two days later Photographer sees little Sarah on the sidewalk, and > > > recognizes her from the pictures he took. > > > > - Photographer gets out of his car, and says "Hi, Sarah - remember > me? > > I took some wonderful pictures of you in the park on Saturday. I > > showed them to your mummy said they're the best pictures anyone ever > > > took of you. Would you like to see them?." Sarah says "Sure!" > > > > - Photographer shows her the wonderful pictures, and shoots her a > line > > about how fantastic she looks in them, and how there's a modeling > > contract she'd be perfect for, and how her mummy wants her to come > > home right away so they can talk about it and sign the papers. > > > > - Sara gets all excited, and climbs into Photographer's car. > > > > - Two weeks later she's found. Most of her, anyway. > > Everything except the first event is imaginary. Does this tell you > anything? > > I can reason similarly: > > - Man parks near me in parking lot. (fact) > > - I go into store, and man watches from parking lot. (imagination) > > - Man puts together his portable machine gun. (imagination) > > - Man cuts me and twenty other people down in a hail of bullets > as soon as I leave the store. (imagination) > > As in the your scenario, only the first event is factual. And, as in > your > scenario, the rest is a product of a very vivid and paranoid > imagination. > > > In fact, this scenario is not so fanciful. > > In fact, it is. It is very dramatically so. How many psychos are > doing this? > Compare that with the number of photographers who take pictures of > people, and > give me the percentage probability that a person who takes a picture > of a child > is a nut. Well, well...... I'm beginning to like you, Anthony. You're absolutely right. Bernard