Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] B&W Film
From: "Gareth Jolly" <garethjolly@bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:27:28 +1000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01BEF4D1.8E517D80
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Andrew Moore wrote:
>
> > Currently, I'm in a process of shooting and evaluating Delta 400. =
Again
> > developed in XTOL 1+1. Just started to print some of my photos from =
my
> > recent trip to Italy on 11x14 (inch) FB paper and I'm really =
impressed
with
> > the low grain and sharpness of D400.
>
> I try this combination (Delta 400 in Xtol 1:1) several times, =
including
> last weekend, and the first thing I notice is the appearance of more
> grain (at least on the negatives -- I haven't printed yet) as compared
> to my Tri-X negatives.  I shoot the Tri-X at 320, and the Delta at =
400.
> I process in 1- or 2-reel stainless steel tanks for 14 minutes at 68
> degrees F.  If anyone has tried Delta 400 in Xtol 1:1, with less =
grainy
> results, I'd like to hear the recipie.


Interesting.  I've been doing some tests of Delta 400 developed in Xtol =
1:1,
with a densitometer.  I am rating the Delta 400 at 250 ASA on my M6 TTL. =
 I
haven't finalised my development times yet, but around 10 to 11 minutes =
at
20 degrees C seems right for normal development.  Grain is pretty good.

Gareth Jolly


- ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01BEF4D1.8E517D80
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Andrew Moore wrote:<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; Currently, I'm in a =
process of=20
shooting and evaluating Delta 400. Again<BR>&gt; &gt; developed in XTOL =
1+1.=20
Just started to print some of my photos from my<BR>&gt; &gt; recent trip =
to=20
Italy on 11x14 (inch) FB paper and I'm really impressed<BR>with<BR>&gt; =
&gt; the=20
low grain and sharpness of D400.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; I try this combination =
(Delta=20
400 in Xtol 1:1) several times, including<BR>&gt; last weekend, and the =
first=20
thing I notice is the appearance of more<BR>&gt; grain (at least on the=20
negatives -- I haven't printed yet) as compared<BR>&gt; to my Tri-X=20
negatives.&nbsp; I shoot the Tri-X at 320, and the Delta at 400.<BR>&gt; =
I=20
process in 1- or 2-reel stainless steel tanks for 14 minutes at =
68<BR>&gt;=20
degrees F.&nbsp; If anyone has tried Delta 400 in Xtol 1:1, with less=20
grainy<BR>&gt; results, I'd like to hear the=20
recipie.<BR><BR><BR>Interesting.&nbsp; I've been doing some tests of =
Delta 400=20
developed in Xtol 1:1,<BR>with a densitometer.&nbsp; I am rating the =
Delta 400=20
at 250 ASA on my M6 TTL.&nbsp; I<BR>haven't finalised my development =
times yet,=20
but around 10 to 11 minutes at<BR>20 degrees C seems right for normal=20
development.&nbsp; Grain is pretty good.<BR><BR>Gareth=20
Jolly<BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01BEF4D1.8E517D80--