Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 09:57 AM 6/23/99 EDT, you wrote: <snip> > It certainly does not seem difficult to create these comparisons. A person > like Bower who has already built a track record with a publisher willing to > print a high quality book (and presumably has access to a wide selection of > lenses) should have little trouble getting the job done if he were willing. > (obviously he is not) > Wouldn't a series of high quality PHOTOGRAPHIC comparisons do a lot to take > the VooDoo out of this subject? > Dan>> > >I think there might be a problem in getting the nuances of lens >performance >to show clearly through all the printing process, especially if you're >talking about very minute characteristics such as what Erwin reports on. >DT This is food for thought. Imagine if such a book were published, including images from a range of Leica lenses and discussing the many optical advantages of the more recent lenses, but the pictures all looked as good as one another, or nearly so? When you remember that microscope examination of slides is used to make some of the comparisons, such a result does not seem so very unlikely. Maybe this is why such a book has not been produced. Joe Berenbaum mailto:joe-b@dircon.co.uk