Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Keith Bingman wrote: > > Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: > > > Glen, <snip> than I. Perhaps they can add to this explanation. > > I used to work at the Univ. of Washington, which has a great collection of old > prints, negs and glass plates and was lucky enough to print a lot of these old > photos from both original and copy negs. > > Indeed the old papers have a much longer tonal range than even the best silver > paper availible today. (As I write this I am exposing a platinum print in the > other room, a 35-40 minute exercise.) I doubt the average print from the last > century was done in platinum, more likely it was a Salted Paper or Albumin > Print. These both have a similar tonal range to Platinum, some 8 stops or so > and with a good contact neg can make amazing prints. You can still buy some of > these papers today. > > There is a list for these things, the Alt Photo list, concerning Platinum and > Palladium, Salted Paper and any number of other antique processes. > Unfortunately for those of us who love our Leicas they almost all require > contact negs... > > Keith Bingman > Riedheim, Germany In the realm of modern Silver Jello Papers I had some Ilford Gallery 0 once which would have been only good for extremely contrasty dense glass plates and that ilk or so I thought I remembered and read. And was used for that purpose at least ten years back. I thunk you had to tone it to get a black out if it. Mark Rabiner