Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would appreciate some advice and reassurance re. a 1960 vintage 35 RF Summilux that I have recently acquired (privately, so I have no recourse to a dealer). The lens is in good condition apart from the fact that it has obviously undergone a slightly incompetent re-assembly. It was immediately apparent that the aperture ring and the lens-hood retaining ring were wrongly aligned (I posted a query about this), and this was easily solved by use of a jewellers' screwdriver. I have since noticed that the distance scale on the lens does not correspond exactly to the actual focused distance when the lens is used on either of my cameras. When the camera and lens are focused at a metre the lens shows 0.9 metres, and when the lens is set at infinity on the scale it is actually focused a little beyond infinity (when focused on distant high clouds). I haven't noticed a problem with focusing on film that I have shot with the lens, and I guess that there can be no real problem if it is merely the lens barrel ring on which the distance scale is engraved which is misaligned rather than the focusing cam that drives the camera's rangefinder. I would appreciate confirmation of my hunch on this. If the only important thing is the relationship between the focusing cam of the lens and the rangefinder mechanism of the camera then I'll get out the little screwdriver again and hope that I can move the distance scale ring until it corresponds with the actual focused distance. I imagine that the problem that I have got here is a simple and superficial one, and not the same as the problem of misaligned lenses as brought up by Hans and others in response to Mikiro's 75 Summilux focusing problems. That misalignment must be between the lens's focusing cam and the glass in the barrel, I suppose. Somebody please tell me I've got this right and I'll forget all about it and get on with using the lens! Simon.