Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 12:59 PM 4/17/99 +1000, you wrote: >Of course, examining shots with a 28mm R vs M would be to way to test >Michael's thesis - given that the 28mm extends to the full frame of an M and Gareth, That's something I didn't think of. I'm sure there are still differences based on the fact that the magnification is different, and near/far relationships, and you can't see, by stopping down depth of field. But in the end, when shooting fast, we might not compose as accurately with a rangefinder than and SLR, or visa versa. I guess it's as much the context of shooting as equipment. This is a highly complex problem. I did overreact to his use of the term "Leica look." For that: excuse me. But we have delved into something truly Leica for once. :-) Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch My computer's sick. I think my modem is a carrier.