Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:01 AM 3/8/99 +0100, you wrote: >All I can tell, is that I have the lens and, while it is heavy and can >sometimes be a burden to carry around, it produces nothing less than >breathtaking results, even in the handheld conditions under which I am using >it most of the time (with a minimum shutter speed of 1/250). Thanks for backing me up with more objective data, Pascal. :-) I can tell you that from experience, when shooting with the 70-180 Vario Apo Elmarit R, and with my 90 Summicron R and 75 Summilux M at the same time (yeah, I know that's quite a load, I've got my 35 and 19 in the bag too) that the pictures that stand out the most are from the zoom. I would not have believed it before using it, but they do. The color is absolutely stunning, even in horrible light where the other lenses don't quite have the same "feeling." The sharpness is phenomenal, and the bokeh quite pleasing. The weight and size are worth it. This past Saturday I was shooting at a local jazz festival. I was hand-holding it at 1/60 second (even down to 1/48), propping it against the backs of seats. Or on my knees. It is so heavy that it stabilizes itself with the R8 so that many of the shots are tack sharp. More useable. And now that I've gotten used to it's long focus throw, I can shoot basketball with it from near the basket and get many of my pictures sharp. That took quite a bit of practice and lots of Fuji 800 to get there. But when I don't need the faster 90 Summicron in dark gyms, now (that the season is over) my lens of choice for basketball is this zoom. Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch The secret of the universe is @*&^^^ NO CARRIER