Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] [ OFF TOPIC ] Bitching against Kodak
From: Andre Jean Quintal <megamax@abacom.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 01:08:47 -0500

At 10:20 -0800 03/03/99, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> I heard that they still in mainland China shoot films in three color
>Technicolor which went out in the 40's everywhere else. I just saw a
>thing on cable TV about it and their head makeup guy said he did a film
>test with all the womens lipsticks on his arm and they all came out
>brown on the new non Technicolor stuff. No reds. All the actresses and
>actors were ready to revolt.

      -->     Considering the traditional importance of reds in the
	Chinese culture, no wonder.

	With the right professionals, Technicolor
	is a strike of genius of a process, as seen from then,
	a smack of simplicity from our vantage point.

      -->     Technicolor + newer lenses + today's print-out emulsions
	must be something else... on a Hortzen (spelling? - ultra
	smooth mechanism + quieter ) / Schneider /
	Bryston 4B St amps / PMC monitors/
	Sony SDDS equipped 35 mm projector
	and other THX certified audio components... Hmmm!

       -->    Did anyone notice there's a f/1.1 anamorphic [ ! ] ZOOM
	available for professional Panavision cameras... ?
	Probably heart attack class prices, too.
	Check Panavision.co.uk
	"Professional Chic .... indeed ! "

	They also offer a bunch of monofocals, without photo database,
	3/4 and anamorphic aspect ratios, some with MACRO
	capability. I wonder if I'd go Carl Zeiss
	over Canon or Angenieux ? No idea.

	André Jean Quintal

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

   "Only when it's dark enough
    can you see the stars."

	Martin Luther King jr