Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01BE60EB.F0948980
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dominique,
I don't doubt that there are "shills" on the web. But do you have =
knowledge that the post regarding the OM equipment was not someone's =
honest opinion? I use my Leica's most, but don't feel put out if I have =
to use my OM-1 or OM-4n. They are fine cameras with a great line of =
lenses. I prefer range finders. But unless you are totally "Leica mad," =
the value and quality of other brands must be acknowledged. And I think =
very few viewers could sort out prints made with a 50 mm Summicron =
($900) and those made with a $40 Zuiko f1.8.=20
Sincerely,
Joe Stephenson=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Dominique PELLISSIER <pelliss@droit-eco.univ-nancy2.fr>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us =
<leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 3:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] olympus vs leica
=20
=20
At 02:45 24/02/99 +0100, Guido wrote :
>I'm also on the olympus list and I've recived this message any =
comments about this:
>
>
>
>:Last month I bought an OM 4T body along with 28mm/f2.8, =
50mm/f1.4,50mm/f1.8, 50mm/f3.5 [macro], and 100mm/f2.8 lenses. They were =
all second hand from an established camera dealer [which also happens to =
be an official outlet for Leica, Nikon, and Hasselblad] so I felt =
comfortable that I was dealing with a legitimate and reputable source of =
supply.I have been using a Leica M3 since 1965 and am M5 since 1987 =
along with 35mm, 50mm, 90mm, and 135mm Leitz lenses so know all about =
sharp and brilliant prints and slides.I have shot reels of Agfa Optima =
100 ISO, Fuji Reala 100 ISO, and Kodak Portra VC 160 ISO through my OM =
4T at a tropical plant conservatory in Vancouver using only available =
light coming through the domed glass roof. The outside weather ranged =
from bright sunlight in almost clear blue skies to cloud and overcast =
skies. The films were all processed at the same place. I have the =
following observations:
1. The sharpness and brilliance of the photos at all points on the =
prints using all fives lenses at varying speeds and apertures was not =
one iota less than I would have expected from my Leitz lenses. There is =
absolutely
no lack of the depth or 3D effect in these Olympus photos and based =
on this three film sample of experience I have to say that I can not =
imagine any more superior performance from anywhere else.
5. I am *absolutely* sold on my Olympus equipment [the results are =
every bit as good as those from the stuff made in Wetzlar or whereever!] =
as well as VC 160 film for flowers and foliage in conditions like those =
I experienced last week.
Let's hear it for Olympus.
#############
=20
I read some months ago in my newspaper Le Monde, the most serious =
and respectable newspaper in France, an article on individuals who are =
paid by companies in order to be "black" or "white knight" on the web.It =
is a new form of economic war using disinformation.
By repeating and commenting these messages, we are innocent =
accomplices of these manipulations.
=20
Dominique Pellissier
>
>
>
>thanks in advance
> Guido Ridoli
> LEICA M SUPERFAN
> guirid@numerica.it
>
>
>=20
- ------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01BE60EB.F0948980
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Dominique,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT size=3D2>I don't doubt =
that there are=20
"shills" on the web. But do you have knowledge that the post =
regarding=20
the OM equipment was not someone's honest opinion? I use my Leica's =
most, but=20
don't feel put out if I have to use my OM-1 or OM-4n. They are fine =
cameras with=20
a great line of lenses. I prefer range finders. But unless you are =
totally=20
"Leica mad," the value and quality of other brands must be=20
acknowledged. And I think very few viewers could sort out prints made =
with a 50=20
mm Summicron ($900) and those made with a $40 Zuiko =
f1.8. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Sincerely,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Joe Stephenson </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =
5px">
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original =
Message-----</B><BR><B>From:=20
</B>Dominique PELLISSIER <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:pelliss@droit-eco.univ-nancy2.fr">pelliss@droit-eco.univ-n=
ancy2.fr</A>><BR><B>To:=20
</B><A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us">leica-users@mejac.palo-=
alto.ca.us</A>=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us">leica-users@mejac.palo-=
alto.ca.us</A>><BR><B>Date:=20
</B>Thursday, February 25, 1999 3:40 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: =
[Leica]=20
olympus vs leica<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>At 02:45 24/02/99 +0100, Guido =
wrote=20
:<BR>>I'm also on the olympus list and I've recived this message =
any=20
comments about this:<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>:Last month I =
bought an=20
OM 4T body along with 28mm/f2.8, 50mm/f1.4,50mm/f1.8, 50mm/f3.5 =
[macro], and=20
100mm/f2.8 lenses. They were all second hand from an established =
camera=20
dealer [which also happens to be an official outlet for Leica, =
Nikon, and=20
Hasselblad] so I felt comfortable that I was dealing with a =
legitimate and=20
reputable source of supply.I have been using a Leica M3 since 1965 =
and am M5=20
since 1987 along with 35mm, 50mm, 90mm, and 135mm Leitz lenses so =
know all=20
about sharp and brilliant prints and slides.I have shot reels of =
Agfa Optima=20
100 ISO, Fuji Reala 100 ISO, and Kodak Portra VC 160 ISO through my =
OM 4T at=20
a tropical plant conservatory in Vancouver using only available =
light coming=20
through the domed glass roof. The outside weather ranged from bright =
sunlight in almost clear blue skies to cloud and overcast skies. The =
films=20
were all processed at the same place. I have the following=20
observations:<BR>1. The sharpness and brilliance of the photos at =
all points=20
on the prints using all fives lenses at varying speeds and apertures =
was not=20
one iota less than I would have expected from my Leitz lenses. There =
is=20
absolutely<BR>no lack of the depth or 3D effect in these Olympus =
photos and=20
based on this three film sample of experience I have to say that I =
can not=20
imagine any more superior performance from anywhere else.<BR>5. I am =
*absolutely* sold on my Olympus equipment [the results are every bit =
as good=20
as those from the stuff made in Wetzlar or whereever!] as well as VC =
160=20
film for flowers and foliage in conditions like those I experienced =
last=20
week.<BR>Let's hear it for Olympus.<BR>#############<BR><BR>I read =
some=20
months ago in my newspaper <I>Le Monde</I>, the most serious and =
respectable=20
newspaper in France, an article on individuals who are paid by =
companies in=20
order to be "black" or "white knight" on the =
web.It is a=20
new form of economic war using disinformation.<BR>By repeating and=20
commenting these messages, we are innocent accomplices of these=20
manipulations.<BR><BR>Dominique=20
Pellissier<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>thanks in advance<BR>> =
Guido=20
Ridoli<BR>> LEICA M SUPERFAN<BR>>=20
guirid@numerica.it<BR>><BR>><BR>> =
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01BE60EB.F0948980--