Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan (in case you are not in Denmark yet), That is saying that if you shoot 300 pics a day, there is a larger probability to get good pics than when you shoot 300 pics a month. My points of difference with Eric might well be: how many keepers a roll ? And pro keeper v. amateur keeper = no automatic per se advantage on the pro side. I'm not sure Eric is really saying anything different to that BTW... Alan (have a nice trip: no avalanche risk in Denmark) Nathan Wajsman wrote: > > No disagreement here. When I hear Ted talk about putting 50 rolls through his > cameras in a day, my mind boggles. If I shoot 5 rolls in a week, I have been > busy. > > Nathan > > Eric Welch wrote: > > > Well, at the risk of offending some fine amateurs here, I will go out on a > > limb and say that pros have a better chance of producing superior work, > > simply because they spend more waking hours making pictures. > > -- > Nathan Wajsman > Overijse, Belgium > > Photography page: http://members.tripod.com/~belgiangator/index.html > Motorcycle page: http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/downs/1704/index.html