Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]RBedw51767@aol.com wrote: > > The wide latitude of Delta 3200 makes me wonder how it would perform > in the 400-800 ISO rating area. I recently and stupidly mistook > Delta 400 for Delta 100 and exposed it at ISO 50. > It all depends on what effects you're trying to achieve. It is unlikely, though I don't know for sure, that Delta 3200 at EI 400 is going to be significantly better than, say, Delta 400, HP-5+ or Tri-X, especially when taking grain into consideration. I'm no expert, but wouldn't contrast suffer too? I seem to remember that, generally, slower films exhibit better contrast than faster films. However, there are no hard and fast rules in photography. I for one would welcome a trial of Delta 3200 at slow speeds, just to hear what pictorial qualities it has. I don't think, though, that it would function as a replacement for slower films, or as a general "use-at-all-EIs" film. M. - -- Martin Howard, Grad. Schl. for Human-Machine Interaction, | HMI/IKP, Linkoping University, SE-581 83 Linkoping, Sweden.| Just Tel: +46 13 28 5741; Fax: +46 28 2579; ICQ: 354739 | say "DOOH" E-mail: marho@ikp.liu.se; www.iav.ikp.liu.se/staff/marho/ +------------