Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Help! Indecision..M4-P vs. CL and Adapters?
From: LEICAMAN56@aol.com
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:48:29 EST

Bob,

Even though the CL is a good 2nd or backup M camera, it cannot hold a candle
to a true M camera like an M4-P.  The M4-P is basically an M6 without the
meter.  It has all the solidity, smooth feel, ultra quiet shutter, focussing
ease, etc., that we all know and love.  Plus, it has all the frame lines for
most popular M lenses, a hot shoe and the ability to take Tom A's Rapidwinder.
A formidable picture taking machine.

As far as screw to bayonet adapters go, once you put the adapter on the screw
mount lens, there is no functional difference from a true M bayonet lens.  In
fact, some of the classic early bayonet M lenses were really LTM lenses with
an adapter held on by a small grub screw or a form of superglue.  I have both
an early 35/2 Summicron and 90/2 Summicron as well as a 21/4 Super Angulon
which are all official factory conversions by these means.  The neat thing
about these lenses is you can remove the adapter and use these wonderful
lenses on a screw mount camera for a fraction of the cost of the original LTM
lenses.  Conversely, the screw to bayonet adapters allow you to use the oldest
standardized Leica LTM lenses on the newest Leica M camera body.  No other
camera manufacturer can claim the same degree of backwards and forwards
compatibility.  The only drawback of the screw to bayonet adapters is that
they might not activate the proper frame lines in the finder.  Leica adapters
all have the frame lines which will be activated by the adapter engraved by
them.  And they cost about $75 on the used market.

Bill Rosauer