Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Marc, I was just going by my interpretation of Erwin's tests. I may have misunderstood the information. Bud Marc James Small wrote: > At 10:02 AM 1998-10-28 -0600, Bud Cook wrote: > >You should have the original 90mm Elmarit-M. It was followed by two > >versions of the 90mm Tele-Elmarit and then the current 90mm Elmarit. This > >lens is ranked behind the current 90mm Elmarit but probably better than the > >two versions of the Tele-Elmarit. > > I've owned and used all three of these. The optical performance simply > gets better as the years go on: the original 2.8/90 is a fine lens, the > 2.8/90 fat Tele-Elmarit is a nicer lens, the skinny Tele-Elmarit quite a > bit better, yet, and the current lens is, from every account, absolutely > out of this world. > > Bud, I like the original Elmarit, but it cannot hold a candle to the later > Tele's nor to the current lens. > > Marc > > msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 > Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!