Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I had a similar disappointing correspondence from Leica UK once, I'd paid over œ600 for a complete internal overhaul of my M5 (about 3-4 years ago) and within 2 weeks it had stopped working completely, it had never failed before the overhaul... I returned the camera with a letter of disgust and recieved a duplicated sheet with merely the words "expected delay 10 weeks", scribbled on it! Nothing about regret, the problem, or apology. I saw red, made a call and wrote a letter and thankfully the camera was back within a week, but tht's not the sort of response you feel you should have to make, is it? Jem ---------- From: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' Sent: 29 July 1998 21:01 To: KIMEJ44; "Leica-Users@Mejac. Palo-Alto. Ca. Us" Subject: [Leica] Final Chapter in Continuing Saga In the interest of not being any more boring than I already have, I'll skip "the story thus far"- if you haven't followed it, don't worry about it. Got the 35 ASPH back from Leica USA today. It looks and feels fine. Obviously I won't know until I do some shooting whether it's fixed properly and for good, but I'm working on the assumption that it is. Repair was charged to Solms by USA, no charge to me. The one thing I find odd is that the only paperwork that came back to me was my original note, etc. Not a word about what was wrong, what they did, or how they regret the fact that I was sold such a piece of defective etc. All of which I find a bit odd. But, if the lens works, as they say... :-)