Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>>>>>>>> >My dealer has a 20-35 f/2.8 Nikkor in stock now, at $1700. He also stocks >Leica. And since Christmas he's sold more of this one Nikkor -- at $1700 >each -- than all Leica lenses combined. Larry And what does that suggest. <<<<<<<<<< I purposely avoided drawing any conclusions when I made my post. Most participants of this list seem pretty adept at drawing conclusions on their own. :-) But the post was made after reading a LUG Digest last night containing a number of interesting comments on the cost of Leica lenses relative to other lines and Leica's lack of meaningful advertising support of their product, at least in the U.S. What I stated in my post suggests to me that photographers will indeed pay large sums for their equipment if the manufacturer participates in creating demand for the product. $1700 is more than or very close to the price of several Leica lenses. But here's a Nikkor figuratively flying off the shelf while competitvely priced Leicas sit. Maybe the 20-35 Nikkor is a more desireable focal range to more users than the $1700 range Leicas. But I also believe that Nikon's (and Canon's) more prominent support of their products in the U.S. through advertising and promotion helps to create more demand for their products. I do think that with more promotion of the virtures of their $1700 products -- smaller size, lighter weight and better quality both optically and mechanically -- Leica could see their lenses figuratively fly as well. Not to the extent of the Nikons and Canons, perhaps, but certainly more than they do now. Disclaimer: I work for an ad agency, so my thoughts on the benefits of well-researched and well-executed promotion are unabashedly biased. Larry