Re: [Leica] summilux 70 (oops...meant 75)

[Mark <mark@steinberg.net>]

Ken Wilcox wrote:
> 
> Never heard of it. Is it for M? Is it smaller than the well known and
> respected 75 Summilux, a truly awesome lens?

i goofed, i meant the 75, which seems to be calling me, requesting
that i add it to my retinue of leica glass.

i'm new to this leica thing and i am achieving results that i consider 
priceless. i'd like to take advantage of the trend, yet the costs are such
that i want to invest carefully.

i'm particularly interested in candid portraits, the focal length suits
my requirements.

foolish ?

mark