Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> From: Ted Grant > > Well of course that's true, however what you are or appear to be doing is > belittling photojournalists who work as true recorders of life as we know > it around the world. - --------------------------------------------------- I am definately not bashing photojournalists. What I do say is that PJ technique is not necessarilly the best (or in your words the only) way to photograph a wedding reception/shower whatever. I fully understand the rational of a PJ not influencing the scene for the benifit of readers who were not present and who expect accuracy. However, all the guests at a reception are already present so PJ ethics don't apply as the guests themselves are both the players and purchasers of the prints. So what's the big deal? I am not a photojournalist nor am I a fly on a wall. Quantom mechanics has proved that nothing can be observed, not even a quark, without an interaction altering its trajectory. The only way a lone man with or without a camera can be unobtrusive in a room full of females with "wedding" on the mind is if he went in drag. Better to take a billiard cue :-)))) Its a question of style, and I am grateful that mine is wierd because I am a constant source of amazement to myself. :-) Alan Hull