Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't know, I do suggest that the 40f2.0 Summicron originally made for the CL is *very* small, smaller in use the than 50f2.8 collapsed. I have not tested it in any way, it makes pix that look fine at 4x6. bmw - -----Original Message----- From: Dave Richards <rchdp@worldnet.att.net> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Sunday, June 14, 1998 2:17 PM Subject: [Leica] Collapsable Elmar >I'm curious about the current version of the 50/2.8 collapsable Elmar-M. >How does it stack up against the current 50/2 Summicron-M? Does the >difference in size and 'pocketability' make up for the difference in >overall image quality? In practical terms, what are the main differences >between it and the 50/2? > >Dave > >