Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They use a Kodak LED digital color printer, which they refer to as a "Pegasus" printer. It images at 250 dpi on RA4 color paper. The results look like normal enlargements to the naked eye (mine, at least). If you inspect them with a strong enough magnifier, you can see that the image was laid down in raster fashion, though the rows of dots merge together quite well. I am not sure what equipment they used to digitize my slide. They advertise that they have a SciTex EverSmart scanner. I would guess that the scanner optical quality has as much (or maybe more) to do with the overall sharpness of the results than the sampling rate at which the slide is being scanned. They produce a TIFF file at 250 dpi of output. Obviously, the scanning and printing steps can be completely independent. However, they (Boston Photo) claim that their overall process is the best available anywhere. Since the first effort was for my purposes just a proof, I had them do no cropping, touching-up, color correction, etc. Just scan, then print. The overall results were good, but still left room for improvement, as noted before. I am sending the digital print to the Ilfochrome printer (Portland Photographics), along with a request that they try to do better, if they can. Once I have the Ilfochrome print, I will show it to Boston Photo and... we'll see. Charles Dunlap <cdunlap@es.UCSC.EDU> wrote: >I had a 6 X 9 inch print made, on 8 X 10 paper, They scanned the >original at 250 dpi of output, that is the slide was digitized to >1500 X 2250 pixels. It was printed on Kodak professional color paper. What is the name of this process? I am aware of three commercial processes for digitally printing a slide. One is Evercolor (incredibly expensive), the second is Iris or Giclee (more affordable), the third is Lambda (almost competitive with Ciba in price). As best I could determine that print that the initial report concerned was made by Irvine Photo Graphics, Inc. in S. California using the Lambda process. It sounds like the print that you had made was on something different since I've only heard rave reviews of the three processes named. - - -Charlie - -- Pieter Bras pieter@world.std.com