Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Friends I had the opportunity to use a 35 (non-ASPH) Summilux and I shot the same scene stopping down from f1.4 to f16. These are my impressions. At f1.4, the picture was soft, lacking in contrast, "not that sharp", and has that ethereal look which reminds me of the shots which were taken decades back when uncoated lenses were used. And don't I just love that corner vignetting which I think can be an artform in itself. At f2, the attributes are not as pronounced as at f1.4. Corner vignetting is just about discernable. From about f2.8/f4 onwards, I could hardly tell the difference between the pictures taken with this lens and my Summicron used at the same aperture. In short, my impression is that this lens has a unique personality when used at large apertures. The new kid (ASPH version) in the block has certainly lots to offer. However, depending on your style of photography, this old dog (non-ASPH version) cannot be replaced either. Imagine one can either crank this lens wide open to create the mystic moods when the need arises or stop down to bring out pictorial sharpness and contrast when the situation demands it. One can say that it is capable of Dual Roles. Although I do not have one, I think those folks who have the non-ASPH 35 Summilux have a gem of a 'DR' lens in their hands. Dan Khong