Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 12:28 PM 5/13/98 -0700, you wrote: >The Nikon and Canon flashes actually have a better density or power, >function, and control per unit size than the Metz units (at least IMHO). >However, the EOS flashes won't work on an M6. Density, maybe, but function? What? I don't remember anything in my old SB-26 that was different or better than my Metz. But then I pretty much use flash for basic light and fill flash. Rarely used second curtain sync, which won't work with the M6. One thing the Metz 40 MZ-3 has over most other flashes (except Minolta as far as I can remember is the exception) is cord-free multiflash TTL sync. Pretty cool, if one can afford several of these babies at $400 plus, and the infrared units for each of the extra flashes. If I was a serious location shooter, or corporate shooter, I'd have a bunch of them. ========= Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO Backups? We doan *NEED* no steenking baX%^~,VbKx NO CARRIER