Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, that's naturally true... I was talking about prints straight from the lab (usually not a custom lab, but often those as well) as compared to slides. If your exposure is spot-on with slides you have a much better chance of getting what you saw color-wise than if you took print film and let soem clown and/or machine print it. On Sat, 2 May 1998, Eric Welch wrote: > At 05:22 PM 5/1/98 -0500, you wrote: > > >One is that transparency film renders much more accurately (thought not > >100% perfectly) exactly what you see in real life on the film because you > > As much as I hate to say it (I am a BIG fan of PKM 25) with a good negative > film and Photoshop and a good dye sub printer, I can do a better job than > any slide film, and most custom labs, at getting what I want in print. And > it only takes a couple minutes. > ========== > > Eric Welch > St. Joseph, MO > http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch > > Maintenance-free: When it breaks, it can't be fixed >