Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Mike's Ten Books(2)
From: Shawn London <srlondon@ibm.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 21:45:57 -0500

Alan Hull wrote:
>But at least they tried.  The experiment failed for
>technical reasons not for aesthetic.

Ansel Adams failed?  People will probably still be buying reproductions 
of his photos long after I'm dead and gone...  

If you consider "failure" to be that other photographers moved onto 
different techniques such as abstraction, then the baroque style of 
painting which you seek to emulate ("cheezy", as an art prof. eloquently 
described it once) is dead and rotting.  Does it invalidate it as an art 
form?  Hardly.  If you like it, by all means, tape your aperture rings 
down at f/16 and click away.

In terms of the harsh responses your original post elicited from the 
group, you must realize that your post was rather insistent, to put it 
kindly.  When you tell a couple hundred successful professional 
photographers and accomplished amateurs that their photography basically 
sucks, how can you expect not be flamed?