Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Stephen Gandy wrote: >the irony is that David Hamilton would achieve world wide fame by using the >simplest equipment, using what is usually considered an amateur's camera. his >success makes for a good argument that most photographer's (including me) >pre-occupation with different lenses is really just a mental excuse for their own >lack of ability and imagination. of course many will take exception, but think >about it. >if David Hamilton can achieve that level of success with only a 50, why can't the >rest of us? Let's see, we've come up with 2 or three photographers in the world in recent history who have been successful with a camera and a 50mm lens. HCB did use more than the 50mm though. How many thousands of thousands of successful photographers in world use more than one lens. It's a statistically irrelevant argument IMHO and means your chance of doing is nill. I would argue that the more creative and imagination you have, the more lenses you need to effectively record that vision. But I shoot a lot of situations for my work that can't be done with a 50mm or the results are much better with a different lens. Limiting yourself to one camera and one lens is a artistic gimmick IMHO. But a lot of lenses in the hand of a fool isn't a recipe for success. World-wide success and recognition on the art side at least, is based on a lot more than pure talent. It's more based on playing to and been taken in by the artistic community than actual talent. It has little to do with equipment or technical quality in reality, shoot why do think the Diana and throw away Ilford BW cameras are so popular. Lastly, I'm reading one reason people state for going to one camera and one lens is because they are tired of carrying a large zoom or a motorized camera. That's a fine argument for your back, but not a sound one photographic wise. There are many situations where 20 or a 24, a 200 or 300 will give you images unobtainable in any other way. It's a matter of how much you want to limit yourself photographic wise. I hate lugging around a lot of equipment too, but when I'm shooting, I don't feel a ounce of it. I try to research as much as possible what I'm going to be shooting. Add experience and that tells me what kind of EQ kit I should take. Duane Birkey HCJB World Radio Quito Ecuador