Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Robert Rose
From: "Dan Post" <dwpost@email.msn.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 13:03:27 -0500

Jim-

I barfed and barfed!! :)

Actually, my brother is an attorney- Known among the family as Shyster Sam,
The Lawyer Man... and he has such an incredible store of lawyer jokes ( all
of which, I am personally convinced, are thought up by lawyers themselves)
<G>
TTFN,
Dan'l
dwpost@msn.com
- -----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Saturday, March 07, 1998 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Robert Rose


>You all can make fun of Robert's field of endeavor and the fee he gets for
>his services, but I'll tell you, if you are facing a court battle with some
>large blood sucking ruthless corporation wanting to rip you heart and soul
>out, you will kiss Robert's feet and offer him a hellova lot more than $325
>an hour to save your hide. In time of need, Robert's knowledge and services
>can be priceless.
>
>All of us LUGpeople, photographers and artists, love you Robert.
>
>Jim
>
>
>
>At 06:52 PM 3/6/98 +0100, you all wrote:
>>At 15:01 05.03.1998 -0800, Robert Rose wrote on trademarks:
>>
>>>I am not going to debate this with you.  I get paid $325 per hour to
>>give opinions on this area.  LUGGers qualify for a discount. <g>
>>
>>If I have a chance against the US, navy, army, Nasa etc when I select
>>the borders and/or surface of the US, or Russia, Near-East, China etc
>>as my trademarks, I pay your fee.
>>
>>I like to earn some easy cash when satelitts take pix of my trademark.
>>
>>Alf
>
>>Alan Hull wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I am not going to debate this with you.  I get paid $325 per hour to
give
>>> opinions on this area.  LUGGers qualify for a discount. <g>
>>> >
>>> > Robert Rose
>>
>>> My last M2 foto earnt ($115).  At 1/500 sec that extrapolates
>>> to $207 Million per hour less tax.
>>
>>Well, that's one argument for shutter priority.
>>
>>-Dave
>